Grigorijs Goldbergs. Comparison of Canopy Height Metrics from Airborne Laser Scanner and Aerial/Satellite Stereo Imagery to Assess the Growing Stock of Hemiboreal Forests.. Remote Sensing, 15(6), 1688 pp. MDPI, 2023.
Bibtex citation:
Bibtex citation:
@article{13501_2023,
author = {Grigorijs Goldbergs},
title = {Comparison of Canopy Height Metrics from Airborne Laser Scanner and Aerial/Satellite Stereo Imagery to Assess the Growing Stock of Hemiboreal Forests.},
journal = {Remote Sensing},
volume = {15},
issue = {6},
pages = {1688},
publisher = {MDPI},
year = {2023}
}
author = {Grigorijs Goldbergs},
title = {Comparison of Canopy Height Metrics from Airborne Laser Scanner and Aerial/Satellite Stereo Imagery to Assess the Growing Stock of Hemiboreal Forests.},
journal = {Remote Sensing},
volume = {15},
issue = {6},
pages = {1688},
publisher = {MDPI},
year = {2023}
}
Abstract: This study compared the canopy height model (CHM) performance obtained from large-format airborne and very high-resolution satellite stereo imagery (VHRSI), with airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, for growing stock (stand volume) estimation in mature, dense Latvian hemiboreal forests. The study used growing stock data obtained by ALS-based individual tree detection as training/reference data for the image-based and ALS CHM height metrics-based growing stock estimators. The study only compared the growing stock species-specific area-based regression models which are based solely on tree/canopy height as a predictor variable applied to regular rectangular 0.25 and 1 ha plots and irregular forest stands. This study showed that ALS and image-based (IB) height metrics demonstrated comparable effectiveness in growing stock prediction in dense closed-canopy forests. The relative RMSEs did not exceed 20% of the reference mean values for all models. The best relative RMSEs achieved were 13.6% (IB) and 15.7% (ALS) for pine 0.25 ha plots; 10.3% (IB) and 12.1% (ALS) for pine 1 ha plots; 16.4% (IB) and 12.2% (ALS) for spruce 0.25 ha plots; 17.9% (IB) and 14.2% (ALS) for birch 0.25 ha plots; 15.9% (IB) and 18.9% (ALS) for black alder 0.25 ha plots. This research suggests that airborne imagery and, accordingly, image-based CHMs collected regularly can be an efficient solution for forest growing stock calculations/updates, in addition to a traditional visual forest inventory routine. However, VHRSI can be the fastest and cheapest solution for monitoring forest growing stock changes in vast and dense forestland under optimal data collection parameters.
Quartile: Q1